What is the most missing feature?

Coordinator
Sep 17, 2010 at 7:47 PM

I just want to open the discussion - please feel free to contribute.

Feb 15, 2011 at 1:21 PM

Hi Marcel

Great work! thanx!

Most missing (just for me :-) : Shortcuts for any commands, with the option to define them individually.

Most missing for  Swiss People who aren't confident with computer English: A German translation :D

 

Other possible features:

- The possibility to choose a track by double-klicking it (as it is already with the cues)

- A gap between the shortcut and the description of it

- "create gap here!" only in 1/100 sec :-)

- new gaps should be inserted in the actual order (in relation to time) and not at the end

 

yours, maece

Feb 15, 2011 at 1:26 PM
Edited Feb 15, 2011 at 1:32 PM

in addition, I would set the default PrePlay Duration to zero.

and a very cool feature would be a write protection

Coordinator
Feb 15, 2011 at 10:28 PM
Hi Maece,

I have added most proposals as Work Items.

But what about:
- "create gap here!" only in 1/100 sec :-)
What does this mean? Should it read "cue" instead of gap? And does it
mean that inserting a cue should not interrupt playing so much as it
currently does?

- new gaps should be inserted in the actual order (in relation to
time) and not at the end
I will look at that. I however have thought that this was already the case.

> - The possibility to choose a track by double-klicking it (as it is already
> with the cues)
What should happen on double-click? It already does select it as far
as I know, but should it play or someting else?

br, Marcel
Feb 16, 2011 at 7:00 AM

cool, thanx

 

to your questions:

- gap is wrong, cue is right :-) With 1/100 is meant, that now the cue is set like this: 1,2345566 sec. It would be better like this: 1,23 sec

- instead of "new gaps" it should be "new cues" :D

- double-click selects the song, but plays the last selected or chosen (by shortcut) cue. I would prefer, that by doubleclicking the track will be played from beginning. Tested with Vista.

 

Coordinator
Feb 16, 2011 at 4:49 PM

OK, most is done, and will be incorporated in an update. What about the cue time. Is seconds ok, like "55.11" seconds, and without minutes or should it better read for example 00:55.11, allowing to have also minutes if the cue is later than 60 seconds in the track?

Feb 17, 2011 at 4:40 AM

the best would be, if you can choose (userdefined) ... :-)

I would prefer 00:55.11

thx for the update, it's getting better and better!

When I deleted a cue, the outlook didn't refresh. So, I chose the cue again, and then the programm crashed. I discovered, that I must change to another track, and then return to the track with the deleted cue. Then it worked fine. So, you should define, that outlook is always refreshed after deleting a cue...

yours, maece

Coordinator
Feb 17, 2011 at 6:54 PM
I have changed the datetime formatting. However, the situation with
the deletion of the cue I could not reproduce. Can you exactly explain
when it does occurr? Probably this is only with your specific
compilation, due to some unknown reason?

br, Marcel
Feb 18, 2011 at 7:26 PM

Hi Marcel

It seems to be a seldom error. I would mention if it would happen again.

Yours